My new 944 ... and it's issues
- Tom
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8563
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:04 pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Has thanked: 890 times
- Been thanked: 3842 times
- Contact:
I was getting a lot of crankcase pressure in my car, from high boost, so I drilled the top hole on mine and it fixed that problem. I added a catch can at the same time but eventually pulled it out because the bigger hole somehow reduced the amount of oil in the intake track. I don't really have a good answer for you, but on a stock, non-turbo car I would probably leave the AOS alone and start by fixing up the car to run as porsche intended.
- PSU_Crash
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2025 4:34 pm
- Location: Decatur, Tennessee
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 96 times
Fair enough. Getting it all fixed up and running as Porsche intended is the goal. Just didn't want to miss an "upgrade" opportunity while I'm in there.Tom wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 6:48 am I was getting a lot of crankcase pressure in my car, from high boost, so I drilled the top hole on mine and it fixed that problem. I added a catch can at the same time but eventually pulled it out because the bigger hole somehow reduced the amount of oil in the intake track. I don't really have a good answer for you, but on a stock, non-turbo car I would probably leave the AOS alone and start by fixing up the car to run as porsche intended.
On my track car I put dual -12 bungs on the valve cover to deal with pressure and made a custom catch can to deal with it. That engine routinely sees 25psi boost and is intentionally built a little loose.
Maybe down the road I'll boost this one, but not likely. I want to enjoy it as it was meant to be. I can't wait!
'86 Zermatt Silver 944 N/A 
'86 Mitsubishi Starion - Purpose built SM class Autocross car
'87 Chrysler Conquest - Mid LS Swap
'86 Mitsubishi Starion - Purpose built SM class Autocross car
'87 Chrysler Conquest - Mid LS Swap
- PSU_Crash
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2025 4:34 pm
- Location: Decatur, Tennessee
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 96 times
Man, I am struggling with the vac line kit from 944online. All of my hoses under the intake were one step from dust or just gone so I don't have a good reference. If work would quit kicking my tail that would be nice too. The glory and curse of being a good at your job 
Time to hit YouTube and Clark's.
Time to hit YouTube and Clark's.
'86 Zermatt Silver 944 N/A 
'86 Mitsubishi Starion - Purpose built SM class Autocross car
'87 Chrysler Conquest - Mid LS Swap
'86 Mitsubishi Starion - Purpose built SM class Autocross car
'87 Chrysler Conquest - Mid LS Swap
- Tom
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8563
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:04 pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Has thanked: 890 times
- Been thanked: 3842 times
- Contact:
Check out the diagrams on Lindsey Racing too -- they are pretty much the to-go vacuum routing guides.PSU_Crash wrote: Tue Apr 22, 2025 6:14 pm Man, I am struggling with the vac line kit from 944online. All of my hoses under the intake were one step from dust or just gone so I don't have a good reference. If work would quit kicking my tail that would be nice too. The glory and curse of being a good at your job
Time to hit YouTube and Clark's.
https://www.lindseyracing.com/LR/Parts/VACDIA.html
Edit: they are for the turbo though and I just remembered you are working on an n/a
- PSU_Crash
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2025 4:34 pm
- Location: Decatur, Tennessee
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 96 times
Tom, I was looking at those last night and a little confused before I realized it was for a turbo.
Stoneguy, Thanks!!
My Thermovalve is broke. Any reason not to just skip over it and connect the vacuum valve straight to the intake? Seems to only vent when it's hot and pulling vaccum. Constant vent when running should be fine, right?
I see a lot of talk about the venturi delete. Mine is all cleaned up and re-sealed, so I planned to re-use it. Reading over on rennlist guys say it's not necessary. Thoughts? It's an odd setup for sure.
The big line off the top intake side of the timing cover also seems strange...
Stoneguy, Thanks!!
My Thermovalve is broke. Any reason not to just skip over it and connect the vacuum valve straight to the intake? Seems to only vent when it's hot and pulling vaccum. Constant vent when running should be fine, right?
I see a lot of talk about the venturi delete. Mine is all cleaned up and re-sealed, so I planned to re-use it. Reading over on rennlist guys say it's not necessary. Thoughts? It's an odd setup for sure.
The big line off the top intake side of the timing cover also seems strange...
'86 Zermatt Silver 944 N/A 
'86 Mitsubishi Starion - Purpose built SM class Autocross car
'87 Chrysler Conquest - Mid LS Swap
'86 Mitsubishi Starion - Purpose built SM class Autocross car
'87 Chrysler Conquest - Mid LS Swap
Thermovalve removal might cause cold start problems as it will lean out the normally enriched mixture. Also, I can't imagine Porsche adding cost (the venturi) if it was unnecessary to meet a performance, emissions, or safety target.
The Venturi is not on the later turbos - I used the 944online Venturi delete and everything seems ok initially.944er wrote: Wed Apr 23, 2025 8:10 am Thermovalve removal might cause cold start problems as it will lean out the normally enriched mixture. Also, I can't imagine Porsche adding cost (the venturi) if it was unnecessary to meet a performance, emissions, or safety target.
1986 951 - Silicon Valley
- Tom
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8563
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:04 pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Has thanked: 890 times
- Been thanked: 3842 times
- Contact:
At least on the turbo, the factory ended up deleting the Venturi in the later years, effectively starting the Venturi-delete trend. I removed it from my turbo and have never noticed a difference, and my CA smog test numbers tend to be freakishly low.944er wrote: Wed Apr 23, 2025 8:10 am Thermovalve removal might cause cold start problems as it will lean out the normally enriched mixture. Also, I can't imagine Porsche adding cost (the venturi) if it was unnecessary to meet a performance, emissions, or safety target.
Fun fact, the Venturi was coined after the Italian physicist who discovered the Venturi Effect, Giovanni Battista Venturi
Personally, I'd keep the thermo valve. Probably won't move the needle either way, but they don't cost much so not sure I'd add another variable into the mix.
- PSU_Crash
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2025 4:34 pm
- Location: Decatur, Tennessee
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 96 times
944er I figure they did it for a reason too, but then like Tom said, it didn't exist in later years. By the way you have a new subscriber. Excellent videos! I have the venturi cleaned up and ready to reinstall so I'll use it for now at least. I just happened to have the correct plug for the thermovalve already. So that's bypassed. Mostly because I'm impatient and want to get this back in running form ASAP 
Whalenlg thanks for the input! It will probably deleted in the future.
Whalenlg thanks for the input! It will probably deleted in the future.
'86 Zermatt Silver 944 N/A 
'86 Mitsubishi Starion - Purpose built SM class Autocross car
'87 Chrysler Conquest - Mid LS Swap
'86 Mitsubishi Starion - Purpose built SM class Autocross car
'87 Chrysler Conquest - Mid LS Swap
