Re: new project
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:25 am
I have a 968 and a spare 3.0L motor. Do you need a car to showcase your work?
Thanks for asking, I guess it’s a good indicator when I have gotten a bunch of notes like this! We are looking at doing two prototypes right now, one is my original 944 turbo that was the development mule for many engines – it needs to be brought back to great condition because its done a lot of hard work and never complained!cp99 wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:25 am I have a 968 and a spare 3.0L motor. Do you need a car to showcase your work?
Keep the thread updated and alive!chris white wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:17 pmThanks for asking, I guess it’s a good indicator when I have gotten a bunch of notes like this! We are looking at doing two prototypes right now, one is my original 944 turbo that was the development mule for many engines – it needs to be brought back to great condition because its done a lot of hard work and never complained!cp99 wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:25 am I have a 968 and a spare 3.0L motor. Do you need a car to showcase your work?
My usual thought on 944s is that they have a good life as street cars and when the get a little older they might get set free as track cars and have a happy retirement. In this case its done both of those and now needs to be reincarnated.
The other prototype is under consideration, depends on what color he likes!
What characteristics will the modern 3.0L turbo have? Minimal lag, free revving, ~7k rpm, 400hp, reliable, good heat management…?chris white wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:17 pmThanks for asking, I guess it’s a good indicator when I have gotten a bunch of notes like this! We are looking at doing two prototypes right now, one is my original 944 turbo that was the development mule for many engines – it needs to be brought back to great condition because its done a lot of hard work and never complained!cp99 wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:25 am I have a 968 and a spare 3.0L motor. Do you need a car to showcase your work?
My usual thought on 944s is that they have a good life as street cars and when the get a little older they might get set free as track cars and have a happy retirement. In this case its done both of those and now needs to be reincarnated.
The other prototype is under consideration, depends on what color he likes!
The 3.0 will be over 500hp (at the crank) using the 8v head. Minimal lag but keeping the 6500 redline. It will rev higher and not blow up but the 8v head gets exponential greater valve guide wear when you rev them up, We are aiming at OEM style life span out of the motor. There will be user adjustable boost so short bursts of high (over 20) will be available.cp99 wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 5:07 am
What characteristics will the modern 3.0L turbo have? Minimal lag, free revving, ~7k rpm, 400hp, reliable, good heat management…?
I’d be all over that and I’ll go with electric A/C compressor and power steering pump a la the 996 cup (which is the same pump as some other cars, so you can avoid the p-car tax).
Will you be using the 2.7 8v head and 104mm block, I always thought with the big inlet port and valve it was destined for greater things. And conveniently I happen to have those in my parts stash.chris white wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 6:26 am
The 3.0 will be over 500hp (at the crank) using the 8v head. Minimal lag but keeping the 6500 redline. It will rev higher and not blow up but the 8v head gets exponential greater valve guide wear when you rev them up, We are aiming at OEM style life span out of the motor. There will be user adjustable boost so short bursts of high (over 20) will be available.
The A/C compressor and power steering pumps are a good idea but we want to keep things to a price point. That being said we are expecting that there will be some level of customization for each car based on the buyers interest.
NCGermerican wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 8:26 am I have heard many people ask why Singer/Gunther Werkz, etc haven't come out with a version of the 944 for those with that kind of expendable income. I think it all comes down to the perception of the auto enthusiast population. While many of the "hardcore" 911 enthusiasts often thumb their noses at the transaxle cars, it all comes down to "what can I have that others do not".
Case in point - I'm sure you've seen the PCA video on Youtube called "The Screamer", which is the 89 951 that had over 200K put into it over it's lifetime. I believe it sold on BAT a few years ago for north of $70K. It was essentially a custom 951 restomod that had some work done by Road Scholars, here in Raleigh/Durham. They focus on the Porsche brand and don't just work on any Porsche. The car was fairly local to me (Raleigh, NC) and I actually got to speak with the owner's son at a local car meetup last year (he was in an S2 Cab).
I'm sure a 951 restomod that commands a $100K+ price tag would (or at least SHOULD) compare or outperform a modern Cayman S or Boxter S, but it would need to be both in acceleration and handling. All it needs is the following and will sell:
1) Is it rare/hard to get/very limited production?
2) Is there extreme attention to detail? (Exterior, Interior, Engine Bay, Underside)
3) Does it look/feel/smell like a brand new car? (no squeaks, no interior crayon or gas smell, genuine leather, carbon bits)
4) Has it created buzz? (PCA Magazine, YT Video reviews, SEMA, etc)
5) Does it still have pop up headlights?.........![]()
The problem is, if it DOES sell, that MIGHT then grab the attention of the Singers and Gunther Werkz's of the world and who might start to make their own....and they have big pockets/connections for R&D and custom parts manufacturing.
It’s a question of price and purpose. A typical Singer 911 is in the $500k range. Ho doubt he could do one if somebody wanted although he might not want to do anything to tarnish his brand. I believe that a lot of the Singer 911s are being bought as collector cars – not driven frequently and kept on display. That’s not what we are aiming for. We want our cars to be driven as much as possible. Could be a daily driver if you wanted. In PCA like many other places there will always be a group that believes their car or the model they really like but can’t own is the ‘best’ Porsche. The one thing that has kept me attracted to these cars is that they are usable. Drive them, track them, polish them up a show that. All good uses. Beat the shot out of a Singer on the track? OK< maybe Seinfeld could do that….but not many others.NCGermerican wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 8:26 am I have heard many people ask why Singer/Gunther Werkz, etc haven't come out with a version of the 944 for those with that kind of expendable income. I think it all comes down to the perception of the auto enthusiast population. While many of the "hardcore" 911 enthusiasts often thumb their noses at the transaxle cars, it all comes down to "what can I have that others do not".
The problem is, if it DOES sell, that MIGHT then grab the attention of the Singers and Gunther Werkz's of the world and who might start to make their own....and they have big pockets/connections for R&D and custom parts manufacturing.NCGermerican wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 8:26 am I'm sure a 951 restomod that commands a $100K+ price tag would (or at least SHOULD) compare or outperform a modern Cayman S or Boxter S, but it would need to be both in acceleration and handling. All it needs is the following and will sell:
1) Is it rare/hard to get/very limited production?
2) Is there extreme attention to detail? (Exterior, Interior, Engine Bay, Underside)
3) Does it look/feel/smell like a brand new car? (no squeaks, no interior crayon or gas smell, genuine leather, carbon bits)
4) Has it created buzz? (PCA Magazine, YT Video reviews, SEMA, etc)
5) Does it still have pop up headlights?.........![]()