Page 2 of 2
Re: Transmission Fluid Recommendations?
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2025 1:43 pm
by Tom
icb wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 11:49 am
I use Red Line MT 90 as well, but I too have an open diff. I believe it will work with an lsd, maybe you'll need an additive. Definitely check, I'm not 100%. Anyhow, I love how the shift feel is, even when cold it still shifts great. It doesn't smell bad, and it's even a nice color! It transformed my transaxle. One thing though, if you have been running a thicker oil like swepco 201 and there's wear in your trans or differential gears/bearings, the mt90 won't mask the gear noise like the swepco did.
Did Swepco reduce gear noise for you? I'm leaning toward Swepco 202 for that reason. With the rear seat delete, anything that reduces gear noise is a big plus for me. In the past, I did try Royal Purple and Amsoil because they were said to reduce noise, but neither seemed to help.
Re: Transmission Fluid Recommendations?
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2025 6:16 pm
by Tom
How funny (or creepy) is this. Before ordering Swepco 202, I wanted to make sure it had LSD additives. I googled it and was comforted that the google AI answer said yes. Then I noticed it's source (this thread) and had to laugh...

- swepcoai.jpg (336.71 KiB) Viewed 305 times
Re: Transmission Fluid Recommendations?
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2025 7:54 pm
by icb
Tom, I don't know for sure if it was swepco, it was what came in Gretchen when I bought her. It was thick, stinky, and probably 20 years old or more.
I flushed it out with mt90 then re-filled it again with mt90 after a few hundred miles. I noticed the whine from my excessive ring/pinion backlash immediately (about 6-7 mm at the cv axle flanges). It was silent with the old stuff. I ran two years, then changed it (mt90 again) and had a used oil analysis done, with excellent results, wear metals in the mt90 sample were low and within normal, expected limits. There was 12,000 miles on it.
Re: Transmission Fluid Recommendations?
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:42 pm
by Tom
cda951 wrote: Thu Jun 12, 2025 7:10 pm
Swepco 202, it's a synthetic version of 201, so good for LSD transaxles but offers improved shift quality (I've always used 201 in my own 951 with LSD, shifting a tad notchy when cold, but great wear protection for track use). 202 is pricey but worth it, has even been a worthy band-aid for worn second-gear synchros on a couple of customer 951s.
I went with Swepco 202 and was able to drive it today. The difference is noticeable -- quieter than before and a noticeably smoother shift into first and second. Worth the extra cost in my book, especially if you have notchy/stiff shifts. Thanks for the heads-up!!
Re: Transmission Fluid Recommendations?
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 2:49 pm
by mwc951
Re: Transmission Fluid Recommendations?
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:17 am
by nick_968
Thom wrote: Fri Jun 13, 2025 4:52 pm
Motul gear competition 75W140.
What is the benefit of the higher number over the 75w90?
Re: Transmission Fluid Recommendations?
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:43 am
by Thom
nick_968 wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:17 amWhat is the benefit of the higher number over the 75w90?
Better protection at every temperature and the R&P will always prefer a thicker oil. No difference in shifting when cold, in my experience.